<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nathaniel Ward &#187; Campaign Finance Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathanielward.net/tag/campaign_finance_reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathanielward.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Was Citizens United Really That Bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/02/was-citizens-united-really-that-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/02/was-citizens-united-really-that-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Gillespie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reason&#8216;s Nick Gillespie makes the case that much of the Left&#8217;s reaction to the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling in Citizens United is overstated. www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUdFaIYzNwU]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reason</em>&#8216;s Nick Gillespie makes the case that much of the Left&#8217;s reaction to the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling in <em>Citizens United</em> is overstated.</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/rUdFaIYzNwU&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rUdFaIYzNwU&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUdFaIYzNwU">www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUdFaIYzNwU</a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/02/was-citizens-united-really-that-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday Links</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/tuesday-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/tuesday-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ilya Somin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yuval Levin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The spending freeze; neoconservatism; Citizens United; and Conan O'Brien.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/25/AR2010012503549.html">proposed a freeze</a> on discretionary, non-entitlement, non-military, non-emergency federal spending. Yuval Levin says this is &#8220;<a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTBiMzFiNzNlOTFjZDQyZjVkMzk4YTkzZmUyN2NiZmU=">a welcome tiny first step.</a>&#8221; Dan Mitchell <a href="http://danieljmitchell.blogspot.com/2010/01/obamas-spending-freeze-is-it-real-or-is.html">is more skeptical</a>.</p>
<p>Newsweek says <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/232053">neoconservatism is alive and kicking</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/21/citizens-united/">CAP responds to <em>Citizens United</em></a>:  &#8221;Indeed, with hundreds of billions of dollars of corporate profits at stake every time Congress begins a session, wealthy corporations would be foolish not to spend tens of billions of dollars every election cycle to make sure that their interests are protected.&#8221; Of course, it&#8217;s the fact that billions are at stake whenever Congress meets that&#8217;s the real problem. Ilya Somin, meanwhile, <a href="http://volokh.com/2010/01/21/corporate-rights-and-property-rights-are-human-rights-why-its-a-mistake-to-conflate-a-right-with-the-means-used-to-exercise-it/">defends free speech rights</a>.</p>
<p>And finally, <a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/122598/the-tonight-show-with-conan-obrien-fri-jan-22-2010">Conan O&#8217;Brien stays classy</a> in his final Tonight Show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/tuesday-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thursday Links</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/thursday-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/thursday-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Larison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news: The Supreme Court has struck down government restrictions on free speech. Here&#8217;s a quick history of such restrictions and why they haven&#8217;t worked. Bad news: America&#8217;s economy is less free now than it was a year ago. The Agitator makes the case that donations in response to disaster don&#8217;t constitute fundraising as such. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news: The Supreme Court has <a href="http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf">struck down government restrictions on free speech</a>. Here&#8217;s a quick <a href="http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-myth-of-campaign-finance-reform">history of such restrictions</a> and why they haven&#8217;t worked.</p>
<p>Bad news: <a href="http://www.heritage.org/index/Country/UnitedStates">America&#8217;s economy is less free</a> now than it was a year ago.</p>
<p>The Agitator makes the case that donations in response to disaster <a href="http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/gift-receiving-vs-fundraising/">don&#8217;t constitute fundraising as such</a>.</p>
<p>Daniel Larison asks a good question: are illiberal governments <a href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2010/01/18/democracy-promotion-and-hegemonism/">necessarily a threat</a> to free governments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/thursday-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m Reading  &#8212; January 14th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/what-im-reading-january-14th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/what-im-reading-january-14th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First_Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free_Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Midterm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rapleaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social_media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from January 12th to January 14th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-myth-of-campaign-finance-reform" title="Link to Bookmark">Campaign Finance Reform&#8217;s Unending Quest to Limit Our Rights.</a> Bradley Smith explains how campaign finance &quot;reform&quot; has continued to erode basic constitutional protections: &quot;every time we close off one avenue of political participation, politically active Americans will turn to the next most effective legal means of carrying on their activity. That next most effective means will then become the loophole that must be closed.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://blog.rapleaf.rsvp1.com/social-insight-into-aol-gmail-hotmail-and-yahoo-email-users-%E2%80%93-part-3-social-network-memberships/" title="Link to Bookmark">Gmail Users Are More Active on Social Media.</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1952807,00.html" title="Link to Bookmark">The GOP Shouldn&#8217;t Count It&#8217;s Chickens Just Yet.</a> Ramesh Ponnuru: &quot;Republicans shouldn&#39;t get carried away. There are 10 months to go before the midterm elections, and the political climate can change a lot in that time.&quot;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/what-im-reading-january-14th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
