<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nathaniel Ward &#187; Federalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathanielward.net/tag/federalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathanielward.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:14:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Friday links: D.C. Council needs to hear conservative policy voices</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/06/friday-links-d-c-council-needs-to-hear-conservative-policy-voices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/06/friday-links-d-c-council-needs-to-hear-conservative-policy-voices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=1448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lydia DePillis says Washington, D.C. needs a fiscally-conservative alternative to the lefty D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute, the only think tank focused on the city’s local government. Are participants in marathons and other event-based fundraisers really donors in the same sense as direct-marketing donors? Tom Belford says no. Pork Barrel Barbecue has released a barbecue-scented fragrance. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 170px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/washingtonydc/4675998601/"><img title="D.C. flag" src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4003/4675998601_0c0b847fa4_m.jpg" alt="D.C. flag" width="160" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: Flickr/Tony</p></div>
<ul>
<li>Lydia DePillis says Washington, D.C. needs <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/housingcomplex/2011/06/15/fiscal-education/">a fiscally-conservative alternative to the lefty D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute</a>, the only think tank focused on the city’s local government.</li>
<li>Are participants in marathons and other event-based fundraisers really donors in the same sense as direct-marketing donors? <a href="http://www.theagitator.net/dont-miss-these-posts/thonors-not-donors/">Tom Belford says no.</a></li>
<li>Pork Barrel Barbecue has released a barbecue-scented fragrance. <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/columns/deb-peterson/article_a94dd620-9149-11e0-8e48-0019bb30f31a.html">Really.</a></li>
<li>It’s not clear why repairing ill-maintained local transit infrastructure <a href="http://dc.streetsblog.org/2011/06/13/obama-administration-pushes-for-transit-maintenance/">ought to be a federal responsibility</a>.</li>
<li>Last but not least, Conan O’Brien spoke last week at Dartmouth’s commencement:<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmDYXaaT9sA"><span class="youtube">
<iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="430" height="264" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/KmDYXaaT9sA?color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;modestbranding=1&amp;loop=&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmDYXaaT9sA&fmt=18"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/KmDYXaaT9sA/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p></a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/06/friday-links-d-c-council-needs-to-hear-conservative-policy-voices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Links: That’s Not Privatization</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/04/monday-links-thats-not-privatization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/04/monday-links-thats-not-privatization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privatization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=1278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outsourcing isn't the same as privatization; federalism in transportation funding; setting up a merchant account; and rick-rolling the legislature.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="photo" style="width: 253px;"><img class="size-full wp-image-1286 " title="Private Parking" src="http://www.nathanielward.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/2011-04-11_private_coltera.jpg" alt="Private parking sign" width="253" height="168" />
<p>Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/christianspenceranderson/2706978287/">Flickr/coltera</a></p>
</div>
<ul>
<li>Municipalities are contracting out various public services like libraries and parking enforcement to private enterprises, and the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/md-firm-to-take-over-3-calif-libraries-as-debate-grows-over-privatization/2011/03/31/AFbrbO2C_story.html">outlines some of the challenges of this approach</a>. Unfortunately, the Post inaccurately describes this as privatization, which is when government divests itself entirely from a current function. Contracting the function while maintaining ultimate responsibility for its provision is simply outsourcing.</li>
<li><a href="http://marketurbanism.com/2010/12/11/private-parking-contracting-giving-privatization-a-bad-name/">Stephen Smith points out</a> that when it comes to “privatization” of government parking facilities, “the ‘owners’ are barely even allowed to set their own prices, nevermind decide to use their land for, *gasp* something other than parking.”</li>
<li>Adam at PlayNice.ly looks into <a href="http://playnice.ly/blog/2011/03/23/web-apps-credit-cards-merchant-accounts-and-paypal/">what’s required to establish a merchant account for credit card processing</a>. Smashing Magazine covers the same ground and <a href="http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2011/04/11/taking-credit-card-payments-online-whats-involved/">suggests a few payment processors</a>. Fundraisers should take special note of Adam’s warnings about PayPal, which may impose long-run costs hidden by its easy setup.</li>
<li>The reliably progressive StreetsBlog argues that it would be <a href="http://streetsblog.net/2011/04/07/the-ryan-budget-doing-the-same-thing-expecting-a-different-result/">a mistake to cut federal funding for bike paths and rail transit</a>, which it argues are cost-effective. But even if a program is cost-effective, does that mean the <em>federal</em> government ought to spend money on it?</li>
<li>Last but not least, Oregon lawmakers rick-roll the legislature:<span class="youtube">
<iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="430" height="264" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fZi4JxbTwPo?color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;modestbranding=1&amp;loop=&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZi4JxbTwPo&fmt=18"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/fZi4JxbTwPo/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/04/monday-links-thats-not-privatization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Links: Paul Ryan on Health Care, Making Matthew 26:11 a Reality and Federalism</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/friday-links-paul-ryan-on-health-care-making-matthew-2611-a-reality-and-federalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/friday-links-paul-ryan-on-health-care-making-matthew-2611-a-reality-and-federalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repeal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conservative strategy for health care reform now that Obamacare is law; the administration's new poverty definition; and how even progressives can love federalism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Paul Ryan has an important article in the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/opinion/26ryan.html">making the case not only for repealing Obamacare but for replacing it</a>. “It is not sufficient,” he argues, “for those of us in the opposition to await a reversal of political fortune months or years from now before we advance action on health care reform.” To build a system that puts patients first, not bureaucrats, he favors “attaching tax benefits to the individual rather than the job” and enabling state-based reforms like risk pools to manage pre-existing conditions.</p>
<p>The government seems determined to enforce <a href="http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/matthew/matthew26.htm">Matthew 26:11</a>. A new poverty metric would count as poor not those living in real destitution but those living in <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/427180/obamas-new-poverty-measurement/robert-rector">relative destitution</a>.</p>
<p>In the Washington Post, Brian Frosh and Jamie Raskin argue that if progressives want to undo the effects of <em>Citizens United</em>—a bad idea, to be sure—they <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/12/AR2010031203149.html">ought to turn to the states</a>, which retain broad regulatory powers.  (Full disclosure: Brian is a cousin.)</p>
<p>And last but not least, an amusing video of President George W. Bush wiping his hand on his predecessor:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="445" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0oHOUnQ0gYI?color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;modestbranding=1&amp;loop=&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0&amp;rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oHOUnQ0gYI"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/0oHOUnQ0gYI/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/friday-links-paul-ryan-on-health-care-making-matthew-2611-a-reality-and-federalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I’m Reading  — October 26th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/10/what-im-reading-october-26th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/10/what-im-reading-october-26th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political_science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social_science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from October 22nd to October 26th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/25/AR2009102502041.html?nav=hcmoduletmv" title="Link to Bookmark">Robert Samuelson on the Public Option.</a> “The promise of the public plan is a mirage. Its political brilliance is to use free-market rhetoric (more ‘choice’ and ‘competition’) to expand government power.”</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703298004574455560453947646.html?mod=djemEditorialPage" title="Link to Bookmark">Unlearning the Lessons of State Health Reforms.</a> “Despite these state-level failures, President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats are pushing forward a slate of similar reforms. Unlike most high-school science fair participants, they seem unaware that the point of doing experiments is to identify what actually works. Instead, they’ve identified what doesn’t—and decided to do it again.”</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/books/20poli.html?_r=1" title="Link to Bookmark">Just How Relevant Is Political Science?</a> </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/10/what-im-reading-october-26th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I’m Reading  — September 6th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/09/what-im-reading-september-6th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/09/what-im-reading-september-6th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 04:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bubbles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cupcake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fisca Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch_Daniels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privatization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web on September 6th]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/metro/salaries/" title="Link to Bookmark">What Washingtonians Make.</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2227216/" title="Link to Bookmark">The Cupcake Boom.</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204731804574390603114939642.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Mitch Daniels Explains the Need for Fiscal Responsibility in the States.</a> “The coming state government reset will be particularly wrenching after the happy binge that preceded this recession. During the last decade, states increased their spending by an average of 6% per year, gusting to 8% during 2007-08. Much of the government institutions built up in those years will now have to be dismantled.”</li>
<li><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/conservative/6142962/Conservatives-float-plans-for-massive-privatisation.html" title="Link to Bookmark">The Tories’ Privatization Scheme.</a> It sounds like a fine idea, but the justification is a bit odd. Aren’t there better reasons to privatize government-run industries other than short-term revenue gains? I hope and expect the Conservatives are making this point.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/09/what-im-reading-september-6th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I’m Reading  — May 25th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/05/what-im-reading-may-25th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/05/what-im-reading-may-25th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centrism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dionne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-mail Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herbert Hoover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from May 23rd to May 25th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/24/opinion/24sun1.html?ref=opinion" title="Link to Bookmark">Spending Restraint? Never!</a> “The New York Times says tax increases, not fiscal restraint, are the route out of recession. Their reasoning? Government will spend your money better than you will.”</li>
<li><a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/16/words-of-warning-from-1940/" title="Link to Bookmark">Words of Warning from 1940.</a> Herbert Hoover: “Directly or indirectly they politically controlled credit, prices, production or industry, farmer and laborer. They devalued, pump-primed and deflated. They controlled private business by government competition, by regulation and by taxes. They met every failure with demands for more and more power and control.”</li>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/24/AR2009052401980.html?hpid=opinionsbox1" title="Link to Bookmark">E.J. Dionne on Obama’s Goals.</a> Can President Obama create a new “centrist” alliance? And can a program really be called centrist if its principal aims are to make everyone more dependent on government?</li>
<li><a href="http://forums.blackbaud.com/blogs/fundraisingwell/archive/2009/05/15/email-marketing-101-subject-lines.aspx" title="Link to Bookmark">Useful tips for writing subject lines.</a> </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/05/what-im-reading-may-25th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.nathanielward.net @ 2012-02-06 13:58:00 -->
