<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nathaniel Ward &#187; Free Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathanielward.net/tag/free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathanielward.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Links: Paul Ryan on Health Care, Making Matthew 26:11 a Reality and Federalism</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/friday-links-paul-ryan-on-health-care-making-matthew-2611-a-reality-and-federalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/friday-links-paul-ryan-on-health-care-making-matthew-2611-a-reality-and-federalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repeal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conservative strategy for health care reform now that Obamacare is law; the administration's new poverty definition; and how even progressives can love federalism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Paul Ryan has an important article in the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/opinion/26ryan.html">making the case not only for repealing Obamacare but for replacing it</a>. &#8220;It is not sufficient,&#8221; he argues, &#8220;for those of us in the opposition to await a reversal of political fortune months or years from now before we advance action on health care reform.&#8221; To build a system that puts patients first, not bureaucrats, he favors &#8220;attaching tax benefits to the individual rather than the job&#8221; and enabling state-based reforms like risk pools to manage pre-existing conditions.</p>
<p>The government seems determined to enforce <a href="http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/matthew/matthew26.htm">Matthew 26:11</a>. A new poverty metric would count as poor not those living in real destitution but those living in <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/427180/obamas-new-poverty-measurement/robert-rector">relative destitution</a>.</p>
<p>In the Washington Post, Brian Frosh and Jamie Raskin argue that if progressives want to undo the effects of <em>Citizens United</em>&#8212;a bad idea, to be sure&#8212;they <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/12/AR2010031203149.html">ought to turn to the states</a>, which retain broad regulatory powers.  (Full disclosure: Brian is a cousin.)</p>
<p>And last but not least, an amusing video of President George W. Bush wiping his hand on his predecessor:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/0oHOUnQ0gYI&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0oHOUnQ0gYI&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oHOUnQ0gYI">www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oHOUnQ0gYI</a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/friday-links-paul-ryan-on-health-care-making-matthew-2611-a-reality-and-federalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was Citizens United Really That Bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/02/was-citizens-united-really-that-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/02/was-citizens-united-really-that-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Gillespie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reason&#8216;s Nick Gillespie makes the case that much of the Left&#8217;s reaction to the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling in Citizens United is overstated. www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUdFaIYzNwU]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reason</em>&#8216;s Nick Gillespie makes the case that much of the Left&#8217;s reaction to the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling in <em>Citizens United</em> is overstated.</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/rUdFaIYzNwU&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rUdFaIYzNwU&amp;rel=1&amp;color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;autoplay=0&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUdFaIYzNwU">www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUdFaIYzNwU</a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/02/was-citizens-united-really-that-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday Links</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/tuesday-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/tuesday-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ilya Somin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yuval Levin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The spending freeze; neoconservatism; Citizens United; and Conan O'Brien.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/25/AR2010012503549.html">proposed a freeze</a> on discretionary, non-entitlement, non-military, non-emergency federal spending. Yuval Levin says this is &#8220;<a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MTBiMzFiNzNlOTFjZDQyZjVkMzk4YTkzZmUyN2NiZmU=">a welcome tiny first step.</a>&#8221; Dan Mitchell <a href="http://danieljmitchell.blogspot.com/2010/01/obamas-spending-freeze-is-it-real-or-is.html">is more skeptical</a>.</p>
<p>Newsweek says <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/232053">neoconservatism is alive and kicking</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/01/21/citizens-united/">CAP responds to <em>Citizens United</em></a>:  &#8221;Indeed, with hundreds of billions of dollars of corporate profits at stake every time Congress begins a session, wealthy corporations would be foolish not to spend tens of billions of dollars every election cycle to make sure that their interests are protected.&#8221; Of course, it&#8217;s the fact that billions are at stake whenever Congress meets that&#8217;s the real problem. Ilya Somin, meanwhile, <a href="http://volokh.com/2010/01/21/corporate-rights-and-property-rights-are-human-rights-why-its-a-mistake-to-conflate-a-right-with-the-means-used-to-exercise-it/">defends free speech rights</a>.</p>
<p>And finally, <a href="http://www.hulu.com/watch/122598/the-tonight-show-with-conan-obrien-fri-jan-22-2010">Conan O&#8217;Brien stays classy</a> in his final Tonight Show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/tuesday-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
