<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nathaniel Ward &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathanielward.net/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathanielward.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:14:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LinkedIn’s April Fool’s Joke</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/04/linkedins-april-fools-joke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/04/linkedins-april-fools-joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 01:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Miscellany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=1153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technology firms have often used April 1 as a chance to play pranks on their customers. Google, for example, is famous for these hoaxes, to the point that its 2004 launch of Gmail (on April 1) was originally viewed as a joke. In a crowded field of 2011 pranks that includes elaborate videos and even browser extensions, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1156" title="LinkedIn's 2011 April Fool's Joke" src="http://www.nathanielward.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/2011-04-01_LinkedIn.png" alt="LinkedIn's 2011 April Fool's Joke" />Technology firms have often used April 1 as a chance to play pranks on their customers. Google, for example, is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google's_hoaxes">famous for these hoaxes</a>, to the point that its 2004 launch of Gmail (on April 1) was <a href="http://gizmodo.com/#!5680391/googles-biggest-mistakes-wave-gmails-launch-and-dejanews">originally viewed as a joke</a>.</p>
<p>In a <a href="http://pogue.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/01/3861/">crowded field of 2011 pranks</a> that includes elaborate videos and even browser extensions, <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/">LinkedIn</a>’s prank is perhaps the subtlest and thus the funniest. They added historical figures and fictional characters to their “people you may know” tool, including Albert Einstein, Robin Hood (“Activist/ Chief Fundraiser at Nottingham”) and J. R. R. Tolkien. Unfortunately, you can’t actually add these people to your network, but it’s a fun gesture nonetheless.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/04/linkedins-april-fools-joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saturday Links: Herding Googlers</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/03/saturday-links-herding-googlers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/03/saturday-links-herding-googlers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 15:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=1020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google researchers discover that good management is the key to good management. Also, Slate investigates pickpocketing; how to redistrict the District; and Remy's new video for Reason.tv.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 234px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/giiks/635254674/"><img title="The Googleplex" src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1123/635254674_19382e30e1_m.jpg" alt="The Googleplex" width="224" height="168" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: Flickr/giiks</p></div>Google researchers discovered that technical ability isn’t what makes a good manager. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/13/business/13hire.html">Instead it’s, well, being a good manager</a>. “What employees valued most were even-keeled bosses who made time for one-on-one meetings, who helped people puzzle through problems by asking questions, not dictating answers, and who took an interest in employees’ lives and careers.” <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2011/03/11/business/20110313_sbn_GOOGLE-HIRES-graphic.html?ref=business">A neat infographic</a> explains Google’s criteria.</li>
<li>Slate explores <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2286010/pagenum/all/">the dramatic fall of pickpocketing in the United States</a>: “In a 2001 story, the <em>New York Times</em> reported that there were 23,068 reported pickpocketing incidents in the city in 1990, amounting to nearly $10 million in losses. Five years later, the number of reported incidents had fallen by half, and by the turn of the millennium, there were less than 5,000. Today, the NYPD doesn’t even maintain individual numbers on pickpocketing.”</li>
<li>Vasilis Vryniotis offers a list of <a href="http://www.webseoanalytics.com/blog/seo-checklist-60-essential-checks-before-launching-a-website/">best practices webmasters should follow</a> before launching a site. These are also good to keep in mind after a site is launched, too.</li>
<li>A new mashup from Greater Greater Washington allows you to <a href="http://redistricting.greatergreaterwashington.org/">redistrict the District of Columbia’s wards</a> based on 2010 census data. Here’s <a href="http://redistricting.greatergreaterwashington.org/#560-66i5qdn7">my take</a>.</li>
<li>Last but not least, Remy has a new video for Reason.tv: <span class="youtube">
<iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="430" height="264" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/iWloySIHcvg?color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;modestbranding=1&amp;loop=&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0&amp;rel=0&amp;hd=1" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWloySIHcvg&fmt=18"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/iWloySIHcvg/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2011/03/saturday-links-herding-googlers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Links: ‘States’ Rights,’ Reining in Spending, Small vs. Limited Government, and Google Search Stories</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/06/monday-links-states-rights-reining-in-spending-small-vs-limited-government-and-google-search-stories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/06/monday-links-states-rights-reining-in-spending-small-vs-limited-government-and-google-search-stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E.J. Dionne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Limited Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“…all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…” Photo: Wikimedia “States don’t have rights,” Stephen Green reminds us. “Individuals do. It’s time we went about the business of restoring those rights, without alienating a huge constituency which suffered too long without them.” Green rightly argues that conservatives’ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="photo">
<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/Declaration_independence.jpg/240px-Declaration_independence.jpg" alt="Declaration of Independence" /></p>
<p>“…all <em>men</em> are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…” <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Declaration_independence.jpg">Photo: Wikimedia</a></p>
</div>
<p>“States don’t have rights,” <a href="http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/an-open-letter-from-the-vodkapundit/">Stephen Green reminds us</a>. “Individuals do. It’s time we went about the business of restoring those rights, without alienating a huge constituency which suffered too long without them.” Green rightly argues that conservatives’ use of the language of states’ rights is not only muddle-headed but, for historical reasons, tends to associate conservatives with Jim Crow.</p>
<p>Nicola Moore and Eric Heis are undertaking an innovative project to raise youth awareness of federal overspending: they’re making <a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/208239308/uome-an-online-game-about-the-national-debt?pos=1">a video game caled U.O.Me</a>. They’re accepting contributions through mid-August to fund the game’s programming.</p>
<p>Realizing that spending is an issue of growing salience, progressives are rallying around new gimmicks like advanced rescission to bolster their budget-cutter bonafides. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/28/AR2010052802759.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">George Will is having none of it</a>: the plan “certainly would not reduce deficit spending: Under the president’s  proposal, if Congress kills the projects on the president’s list, the  budgetary allocation would not be reduced, so legislators could dream up  new things on which to spend the money.”</p>
<p>Timothy Carney, for his part, <a href="http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/War-on-the-military-industrial-complex-95051949.html">wonders if conservatives will look to military budgets</a> as a source of savings.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/26/AR2010052604013.html">E.J. Dionne says it’s ironic</a> that conservatives who decry big government are calling for the federal government to more effectively manage the Gulf oil spill. Dionne, of course, is missing the point: there’s a difference between effective government (or energetic government, as Publius dubbed it in the <em>Federalist</em>) and big government. But all too many conservatives allow progressives to make such arguments by advocating for <em>small </em>government rather than a <em>limited </em>government that undertakes only its core responsibilities.</p>
<p>And last but not least, <a href="http://vimeo.com/9007606">this is a clever submission</a> to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/SearchStories">Google’s Search Stories</a> campaign:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="225" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=9007606&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="225" src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=9007606&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/06/monday-links-states-rights-reining-in-spending-small-vs-limited-government-and-google-search-stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thursday Links: Burkeanism Après le Deluge, Scaling Web Sites with CSS, and Google’s Font Directory</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/thursday-links-burkeanism-apres-le-deluge-scaling-web-sites-with-css-and-googles-font-directory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/thursday-links-burkeanism-apres-le-deluge-scaling-web-sites-with-css-and-googles-font-directory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 14:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmund Burke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would Edmund Burke do? Also: using CSS media queries to scale web sites; Europe's welfare state; and Google's free web fonts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="photo">
<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Burke.jpg/240px-Burke.jpg" alt="Edmund Burke: Photo: Wikimedia" /></p>
<p>Edmund Burke <a>Photo: Wikimedia</a></p>
</div>
<p>Jonathan Adler argues that <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZmU4ODUyYmUxMzljYmU4ZWU4MGM5YWQ0MmZkOWU5ZjI=">many  self-described followers of Edmund Burke are anything but</a>: “The  institutions [David] Brooks would defend today bear no resemblance to the   organic institutions Burke sought to protect.  Indeed, they have crowded   out and, in some cases crushed, the little platoons upon which social   order depends.  So the meaningful question for a true Burkean is not   whether to oppose a Jacobin revolution, but what to do after such a   revolution has already taken place.”</p>
<p>In the latest issue of <em>A List Apart</em>, Ethan Marcotte explains <a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/responsive-web-design/">how to use CSS style sheets to create a web site that scales well</a> to varying screen resolutions. For example, he uses CSS media queries to create a single page that renders well on an iPhone, on a standard monitor and on a wide-screen monitor. I’ve implemented some of his techniques on this page to make an iPhone-friendly version.</p>
<p>Europe’s “<a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100523/D9FSPCAO1.html">current welfare  state is unaffordable</a>…The crisis has made the  day of reckoning closer by several years in virtually all the industrial  countries.”</p>
<p>And last but not least, Google has <a href="http://code.google.com/webfonts">made several excellent fonts available for free use</a> on other sites through a simple CSS call. <a href="http://code.google.com/webfonts/family?family=OFL+Sorts+Mill+Goudy+TT">OFL Sorts Mill Goudy TT</a> is now the default font for this  site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/thursday-links-burkeanism-apres-le-deluge-scaling-web-sites-with-css-and-googles-font-directory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Links: Free Enterprise vs. Statism, Beautiful Transit, and Changing Cities</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/monday-links-free-enterprise-vs-statism-beautiful-transit-and-changing-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/monday-links-free-enterprise-vs-statism-beautiful-transit-and-changing-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 19:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arthur Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dependency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WMATA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arthur Brooks draws the battle lines in today's culture war; a good-looking transit project in Maryland; must-reads on urban policy for conservatives; and how Google destroys office productivity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="photo">
<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0a/AdamSmith.jpg/240px-AdamSmith.jpg" alt="Adam Smith" /></p>
<p>Will Adam Smith’s principles prevail? <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:AdamSmith.jpg">Photo: Wikimedia</a></p>
</div>
<p>The new culture war “is not a fight over guns, gays or abortion,” Arthur Brooks argues, but <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/21/AR2010052101854.html">a battle between free enterprise and statism</a>. Supporters of free enterprise need to make a moral case for their system, he writes, to demonstrate that “earned success” is superior to dependence on government, and not simply hold that free enterprise delivers better material results.</p>
<p>Speaking of dependence on government, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/24/business/economy/24childcare.html">the <em>New York Times</em> claims</a> that the insufficiency of one government subsidy, for child care, is driving families onto another government subsidy, welfare. However did people cope before government provided everything?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.purplelinemd.com/images/stories/purpleline_documents/publications/PL%20Did%20You%20Know%20Web.pdf">Renderings of the proposed Purple Line in Maryland</a> show there’s no reason transit has to be ugly (link in PDF). While landscaping may add to the project’s cost, it’s worth remembering that aesthetics matter and that there’s a difference between lowering costs and cutting corners.</p>
<p>The Atlantic is running a <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/special-report/the-future-of-the-city/">special report on the changing American city</a>. Every article is worth a read. Progressives have for too long dominated debates over urban policy; it behooves conservatives to engage this debate head-on and offer real solutions to problems facing cities.</p>
<p>And last but not least, <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/pac-man-rules.html">Google has announced</a> it will make its Pac-Man doodle <a href="http://www.google.com/pacman/">permanently available</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/monday-links-free-enterprise-vs-statism-beautiful-transit-and-changing-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monday Links: Jim Bunning, Bad Architecture, Gordon Brown and Google</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/monday-links-jim-bunning-bad-architecture-gordon-brown-and-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/monday-links-jim-bunning-bad-architecture-gordon-brown-and-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Bunning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Bunning holds the line on spending; the ugly new American embassy in London; Simon Heffer on Gordon Brown; and Google's algorithm.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) takes an <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/26/jim-bunning-repeatedly-bl_n_477910.html">unpopular yet important stand against deficit spending</a>. Will his colleagues stand with him?</li>
<li>Not only is the <a href="http://londonist.com/2010/02/design_for_new_us_embassy_building.php">winning design</a> for the new U.S. embassy in London embassy horribly ugly, but <a href="http://londonist.com/2010/02/us_embassy_exhibition_new_london_ar.php">so are all the runners-up</a>. Why do so many architects think their buildings have to eschew traditional design conventions to be any good?</li>
<li>Simon Heffer offers some <a href="http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2010/03/cameron-party-tories-schools">unkind words</a> about the man who could be Britain’s next prime minister (<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601104&amp;sid=arNYfnclPbx8">maybe</a>). “Cameron shifts easily on such issues because he has very few principles, other than his belief in himself as prime minister. If it is feasible one day to reward marriage through the tax system, he will do so. If it is not, he won’t really care less. Such is the mindset of the former public relations man, whose elastic intellect can be placed on whatever side of whatever argument.”</li>
<li>And last but not least, <a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/02/ff_google_algorithm/all/1">Wired’s article about Google’s algorithm</a> provides not only a fascinating look at search technology but an interesting case study of an organization that consistently innovates.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/monday-links-jim-bunning-bad-architecture-gordon-brown-and-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wednesday Links: The Filibuster, the Real Climate Change Agenda, and Google Buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/02/wednesday-links-the-filibuster-the-real-climate-change-agenda-and-google-buzz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/02/wednesday-links-the-filibuster-the-real-climate-change-agenda-and-google-buzz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jonah Goldberg points out the obvious flaw in the left’s critique of the filibuster: “Of course the filibuster is undemocratic. This is not some bombshell revelation. And yet in indictment after indictment of the filibuster — and the Senate generally — you hear people level the ‘undemocratic’ charge as if it should be dispositive. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Jonah Goldberg <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=N2JjMjRjY2UxMjgxNGIxNGIwN2Q0YWNiMjA0NDhiZWQ=">points out the obvious flaw</a> in the left’s critique of the filibuster: “Of course the filibuster is undemocratic. This is not some bombshell revelation. And yet in indictment after indictment of the filibuster — and the Senate generally — you hear people level the ‘undemocratic’ charge as if it should be dispositive. The Senate was never intended to be all that democratic.” Besides, the left’s attack on the filibuster is opportunistic and politically-motivated, just like the GOP’s similar argument in the 2005 debate over judicial nominees. The filibuster may thwart the “will of the people” at times, but the Founders were right to understand that this isn’t always a bad thing.</li>
<li>In an astounding letter in the <em>Financial Times</em>, Manfred Körner argues that green policies <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/808de9c6-1519-11df-ad58-00144feab49a.html">aren’t really about climate change at all</a> but rather about achieving the left’s economic agenda. “Leaving the scientific issue aside,” he writes, “climate change advocates have built the necessary broad emotional and moral thrust behind the issue to make economic change acceptable and awaken a sense of urgency.” Still more astoundingly, he audaciously cites Joseph Schumpeter to make the case for such economic policies — never mind that Schumpeter’s concept of “creative destruction” is premised on individuals freely choosing their own paths, not command-and-control bureaucracies.</li>
<li>And last but not least, Google has unleashed <a href="http://www.google.com/buzz">Google Buzz</a>, a social media aggregator that plugs into GMail. <a href="http://twitter.com/DavidAll/status/8868931686">David All points me</a> to <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2010/02/09/why-google-wont-give-twitter-or-facebook-a-buzz-cut-tomorrow/">Robert Scoble’s pessimistic take</a> on the new product. I’m less sure it’s doomed to mediocrity. For one thing, it’s built right into Google’s widely-used e-mail program, which is widely and frequently used.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/02/wednesday-links-the-filibuster-the-real-climate-change-agenda-and-google-buzz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I’m Reading  — July 8th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/07/what-im-reading-july-8th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/07/what-im-reading-july-8th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from July 6th to July 8th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YmJhNDc4NzRkM2M4ZjIwYjJmYWViNzQwZmEwMTI2YTI=" title="Link to Bookmark">Does More Prevention Mean Lower Cost?</a> Not necessarily, argues Mark Steyn.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.copyblogger.com/facebook-killing-seo/" title="Link to Bookmark">How Facebook is Gunning for Google (And Killing SEO)</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200907/california" title="Link to Bookmark">Echoes of Herbert Croly’s Promise of American Life.</a> “For nearly a century, California offered ordinary people better lives than they could lead perhaps anywhere else in the world. Today, reflecting our intensely stratified, increasingly mobile society, California affords the Good Life only to the most gifted and ambitious, regardless of their background. That’s a deeply undemocratic betrayal of California’s dream—and of the promise of American life.”</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/07/what-im-reading-july-8th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.nathanielward.net @ 2012-02-09 16:54:34 -->
