<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nathaniel Ward &#187; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathanielward.net/tag/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathanielward.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:21:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Unions Can&#8217;t Be Happy With This Sketch</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/the-unions-cant-be-happy-with-this-sketch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/the-unions-cant-be-happy-with-this-sketch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 02:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live takes on public-sector unions in a hilarious sketch.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturday Night Live takes on public-sector unions in this hilarious sketch:</p>
<p><object width="512" height="296 "><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/AmuCTb1tvO-5YOc5N-97Mg"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/AmuCTb1tvO-5YOc5N-97Mg" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true"  width="512" height="296"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/the-unions-cant-be-happy-with-this-sketch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m Reading  &#8212; January 3rd</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/what-im-reading-january-3rd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/what-im-reading-january-3rd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 06:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave_Barry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher_Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William_Vogeli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from December 28th to January 3rd.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=26&amp;storycode=409225" title="Link to Bookmark">What Made American Universities Great.</a> &quot;Ivy League institutions rose to greatness only after being cut off from state aid and meddling.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.city-journal.org/2009/19_4_california.html" title="Link to Bookmark">What&#8217;s the Matter With California?</a> William Vogeli explains how the &quot;big-spending, high-taxing, lousy-services paradigm&quot; is ruining California&#39;s appeal.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/living/columnists/dave-barry/v-fullstory/story/1397654.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Dave Barry Looks Back on 2009.</a> Choice quote: &quot;Washington, rejecting &#39;business as usual,&#39; finally stopped trying to solve every problem by throwing billions of taxpayer dollars at it and instead started trying to solve every problem by throwing trillions of taxpayer dollars at it.&quot;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/01/what-im-reading-january-3rd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m Reading  &#8212; October 26th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/10/what-im-reading-october-26th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/10/what-im-reading-october-26th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political_science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social_science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from October 22nd to October 26th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/25/AR2009102502041.html?nav=hcmoduletmv" title="Link to Bookmark">Robert Samuelson on the Public Option.</a> &quot;The promise of the public plan is a mirage. Its political brilliance is to use free-market rhetoric (more &#39;choice&#39; and &#39;competition&#39;) to expand government power.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703298004574455560453947646.html?mod=djemEditorialPage" title="Link to Bookmark">Unlearning the Lessons of State Health Reforms.</a> &quot;Despite these state-level failures, President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats are pushing forward a slate of similar reforms. Unlike most high-school science fair participants, they seem unaware that the point of doing experiments is to identify what actually works. Instead, they&#39;ve identified what doesn&#39;t&mdash;and decided to do it again.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/books/20poli.html?_r=1" title="Link to Bookmark">Just How Relevant Is Political Science?</a> </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/10/what-im-reading-october-26th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m Reading  &#8212; September 14th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/09/what-im-reading-september-14th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/09/what-im-reading-september-14th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max_Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norman_Podhoretz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from September 13th to September 14th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/14/AR2009091403519.html?hpid=topnews" title="Link to Bookmark">Class Warfare.</a> Responding to hard times, governments around the world decide not to tighten their belts but to increase their revenues through punitive taxes.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/14/AR2009091403573.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Is This Really a Compromise?</a> The Baucus proposal addresses superficial concerns but doesn&#39;t address the principal conservative complaint about the Left&#39;s health care plan: that it vastly increases the size and scope of the federal government.</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203440104574402591116901498.html?mod=djemEditorialPage" title="Link to Bookmark">Norman Podhoretz on Why Jews are Liberals.</a> &quot;[I]n virtually every instance of a clash between Jewish law and contemporary liberalism, it is the liberal creed that prevails for most American Jews. Which is to say that for them, liberalism has become more than a political outlook. It has for all practical purposes superseded Judaism and become a religion in its own right.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/business/economy/13econ.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Tyler Cowen on Politics and the Economy.</a> &quot;But we are now injecting politics ever more deeply into the American economy, whether it be in finance or in sectors like health care. Not only have we failed to learn from our mistakes, but also we&rsquo;re repeating them on an ever-larger scale.&quot;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/09/what-im-reading-september-14th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m Reading  &#8212; August 30th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/08/what-im-reading-august-30th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/08/what-im-reading-august-30th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 04:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new_criterion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressivism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from August 27th to August 30th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://artofmanliness.com/2008/05/14/100-must-read-books-the-essential-mans-library/" title="Link to Bookmark">100 Must-Read Books: The Essential Man&rsquo;s Library.</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200909/health-care/" title="Link to Bookmark">How Consumer-Based Reforms Can Fix What Ails Health Care.</a> David Goldhill on how the current system fails us and what to do about it. &quot;The most important single step we can take toward truly reforming our system is to move away from comprehensive health insurance as the single model for financing care. And a guiding principle of any reform should be to put the consumer, not the insurer or the government, at the center of the system.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/Is-conservatism-dead--4166" title="Link to Bookmark">Is Conservatism Dead?</a> &quot;Like the liberal writers of the 1950s, Tanenhaus wants to see a conservative movement that accommodates rather than opposes liberalism, and thus one that will accept its role as subordinate to the dominant liberal tradition in American life.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pcourrielche/2009/08/25/the-national-endowment-for-the-art-of-persuasion-patrick-courrielche/#more-209182" title="Link to Bookmark">Should the NEA Promote the Obama Agenda?</a> &quot;Do you think it is the place of the NEA to encourage the art community to address issues currently under legislative consideration?&quot;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/08/what-im-reading-august-30th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m Reading  &#8212; July 21st</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/07/what-im-reading-july-21st/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/07/what-im-reading-july-21st/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 01:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bipartisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Boies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dependency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Franck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miscegenation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partisanship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prop8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Samuelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-Sex Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William McGurn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from July 13th to July 21st.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203946904574301103588765812.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Obama Is No Post-Partisan.</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://bench.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MmI3YWVkYWQwZTUyNTVkNjZlMDEwNzBjMmExYTdiNjE=" title="Link to Bookmark">Deconstructing a Poor Argument for Same-Sex Marriage.</a> </li>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/12/AR2009071201533.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Samuelson on the Consequences of Big Government.</a> &quot;Without anyone much noticing, our national government is on the verge of a permanent expansion that would endure long after the present economic crisis has (presumably) passed and that would exceed anything ever experienced in peacetime.&quot;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/07/what-im-reading-july-21st/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m Reading  &#8212; June 5th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/06/what-im-reading-june-5th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/06/what-im-reading-june-5th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from June 4th to June 5th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1902361,00.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Competitive Altruism.</a> This article misses a key point that economists since Adam Smith have understood: &quot;It is not from the benevolence of the butcher the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. We address ourselves, not to their humanity, but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities, but of their advantages.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124407379245683253.html" title="Link to Bookmark">VATs Mean Big Government</a> &quot;The income tax system we have today is a nightmarish combination of class warfare and corrupt loopholes. Adding a VAT does not undo any of the damage it imposes. All that happens is that politicians get more money to spend and a chance to auction off a new set of tax breaks to interest groups. That&#39;s good for Washington, but bad for America.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000003134973" title="Link to Bookmark">The Health Care Fight Got Tougher.</a> The Blue Dogs have agreed in principle to a &quot;public option&quot; government-run health insurance provider, one that would &quot;compete&quot; with private sector plans.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/06/what-im-reading-june-5th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m Reading  &#8212; June 4th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/06/what-im-reading-june-4th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/06/what-im-reading-june-4th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dependency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[momentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from June 3rd to June 4th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-06-03-benefits_N.htm" title="Link to Bookmark">Dependence on Government Grows.</a> This is not good news. &quot;The recession is driving the safety net of government benefits to a historic high, as one of every six dollars of Americans&#39; income is now coming in the form of a federal or state check or voucher.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/03/AR2009060303173.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Are Progressives Losing Steam?</a> Dana Milbank notes that &quot;it&#39;s more fun to be an opposition bomb-thrower than a palace guard.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cjr.org/feature/heresy_on_the_right.php?page=all" title="Link to Bookmark">The Rise of New Conservative Media Outlets.</a> </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/06/what-im-reading-june-4th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I&#8217;m Reading  &#8212; May 25th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/05/what-im-reading-may-25th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/05/what-im-reading-may-25th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 01:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I'm Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centrism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dionne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-mail Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herbert Hoover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from May 23rd to May 25th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/24/opinion/24sun1.html?ref=opinion" title="Link to Bookmark">Spending Restraint? Never!</a> &quot;The New York Times says tax increases, not fiscal restraint, are the route out of recession. Their reasoning? Government will spend your money better than you will.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/05/16/words-of-warning-from-1940/" title="Link to Bookmark">Words of Warning from 1940.</a> Herbert Hoover: &quot;Directly or indirectly they politically controlled credit, prices, production or industry, farmer and laborer. They devalued, pump-primed and deflated. They controlled private business by government competition, by regulation and by taxes. They met every failure with demands for more and more power and control.&quot;</li>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/24/AR2009052401980.html?hpid=opinionsbox1" title="Link to Bookmark">E.J. Dionne on Obama&#8217;s Goals.</a> Can President Obama create a new &quot;centrist&quot; alliance? And can a program really be called centrist if its principal aims are to make everyone more dependent on government?</li>
<li><a href="http://forums.blackbaud.com/blogs/fundraisingwell/archive/2009/05/15/email-marketing-101-subject-lines.aspx" title="Link to Bookmark">Useful tips for writing subject lines.</a> </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/05/what-im-reading-may-25th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m Not Holding My Breath</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/02/im-not-holding-my-breath/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/02/im-not-holding-my-breath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn't much matter whether government actually delivers but rather whether it's seen to deliver. The New Deal, for example, despite its repeated failures and cockamamie schemes, has nevertheless been judged a success by history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/22/AR2009022201759.html">Will government demonstrate its effectiveness?</a></p>
<blockquote><div class="blockquote_extender"><span>&lsquo;</span></div><p>The stimulus package is not only a political crucible for Obama and the congressional Democrats who pushed it through; it is also the ultimate test of government&#8217;s ability to deliver, from a vast array of federal agencies and departments down to state and local offices across the country.</p>
<p>It will be up to thousands of Cabinet undersecretaries, regional agency directors and local contracting officers to get the stimulus money out fast enough to boost the economy and to meet Obama&#8217;s broader policy goals. Obama has cast his election as a repudiation of an anti-government philosophy that has been in vogue for the past three decades. The stimulus spending offers the prospect of renewing confidence in the public sector just as many are losing faith in corporate America. If done poorly, though, it could undermine Obama&#8217;s longer-term vision of reaffirming the positive role of government in the lives of Americans.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, it doesn&#8217;t much matter whether government actually delivers but rather whether it&#8217;s <em>seen </em>to deliver. The New Deal, for example, despite its repeated failures and cockamamie schemes, has nevertheless been judged a success by history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/02/im-not-holding-my-breath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
