<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nathaniel Ward &#187; Obamacare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nathanielward.net/tag/obamacare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nathanielward.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:14:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday Links: Families in the City, Medicare Bankruptcy, Malthus Returns, the Not-Racist NYPD, and Obesity</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/tuesday-links-families-in-the-city-medicare-bankruptcy-malthus-returns-the-not-racist-nypd-and-obesity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/tuesday-links-families-in-the-city-medicare-bankruptcy-malthus-returns-the-not-racist-nypd-and-obesity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 14:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heather Mac Donald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malthus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan_McArdle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Families are increasingly living in cities, and conservatives need to offer them solutions; Medicare's false "savings"; Mother Jones finds much to love in Thomas Malthus; why the NYPD isn't racist; and whether obesity is really a problem.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="photo"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3410/3614077105_d72b819120_m.jpg" alt="Photo by citta-vita" />
<p>Photo: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/koshalek/3614077105/sizes/s/">citta-vita</a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/15/AR2010051503637.html?hpid=topnews">Cities like New York and Washington are undergoing something of a baby boom</a> as families increasingly settle in urban areas instead of the suburbs. This demographic development is causing new sorts of problems—like the relative unfriendliness of some city services to children—and conservatives need to be ready with real policy solutions for these young families.</p>
<p>It turns out Obamacare’s alleged Medicare savings don’t really add up to much. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100501/ap_on_bi_ge/us_medicare_fact_check_q_a">Too bad the AP tells us <em>after</em> the legislation passes</a>.</p>
<p><em>Mother Jones</em>’ May issue includes a truly <a href="http://motherjones.com/special-reports/2010/05/population-last-taboo">astounding series of articles</a> on population and sustainability that argues, explicitly, that Malthus was right after all. One article, not online, even goes so far as to suggest the government deliberately engineer a zero-GDP-growth economy, a scheme even the author admits suffers from more than a few conceptual and practical flaws.</p>
<p>Heather Mac Donald swats down the <a href="http://www.city-journal.org/2010/eon0514hm.html"><em>New York Times</em>’s sloppy accusations of NYPD racism</a>: “The actual crime rates reveal that blacks are being significantly  understopped, compared with their representation in the city’s criminal  population, another reason for omitting them from the paper’s  reporting.”</p>
<p>And last but not least, Megan McArdle <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2009/07/americas-moral-panic-over-obesity/22397/">explores whether obesity is as much of a problem as the worrywarts tell us</a>. The surprising conclusion: not really, and we can’t do much about it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/tuesday-links-families-in-the-city-medicare-bankruptcy-malthus-returns-the-not-racist-nypd-and-obesity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare, TARP and the Separation of Powers</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/obamacare-tarp-and-the-separation-of-powers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/obamacare-tarp-and-the-separation-of-powers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 03:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Kesler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tarp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Kesler has an important article in the May 17 issue of National Review (republished online over at Claremont Conservative) on the importance of constitutionalism. The penultimate paragraph highlights the importance of restoring the Constitution to its rightful place: In the current crisis, conservative efforts to restore the separation of powers may even be more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles Kesler has an important article in the May 17 issue of <em>National Review</em> (<a href="http://www.claremontconservative.com/2010/05/professor-keslers-cover-story-for.html">republished online over at Claremont Conservative</a>) on the importance of constitutionalism. The penultimate paragraph highlights the importance of restoring the Constitution to its rightful place:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In the current crisis, conservative efforts to restore the separation of powers may even be more important than a campaign to shore up federalism. TARP, for example, was an unprecedented delegation of legislative power to the Treasury secretary, of all people. It was a desperate, essentially lawless grant resembling the ancient Roman dictatorship, except that the Romans wisely confined their dictators to six-month terms. Obamacare is a 2,000-page monstrosity that will need thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of pages of additional regulations before it can operate. These will be issued by more than a hundred new bureaucracies, each a source of unaccountable power wielded over individual Americans. These multiplying centers of petty tyranny will accelerate our transformation from a republic of laws to a corrupt regime of muddled and ever more arbitrary power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/05/obamacare-tarp-and-the-separation-of-powers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday Links: Paul Ryan on Health Care, Making Matthew 26:11 a Reality and Federalism</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/friday-links-paul-ryan-on-health-care-making-matthew-2611-a-reality-and-federalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/friday-links-paul-ryan-on-health-care-making-matthew-2611-a-reality-and-federalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repeal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conservative strategy for health care reform now that Obamacare is law; the administration's new poverty definition; and how even progressives can love federalism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Paul Ryan has an important article in the <em>New York Times</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/26/opinion/26ryan.html">making the case not only for repealing Obamacare but for replacing it</a>. “It is not sufficient,” he argues, “for those of us in the opposition to await a reversal of political fortune months or years from now before we advance action on health care reform.” To build a system that puts patients first, not bureaucrats, he favors “attaching tax benefits to the individual rather than the job” and enabling state-based reforms like risk pools to manage pre-existing conditions.</p>
<p>The government seems determined to enforce <a href="http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/matthew/matthew26.htm">Matthew 26:11</a>. A new poverty metric would count as poor not those living in real destitution but those living in <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/427180/obamas-new-poverty-measurement/robert-rector">relative destitution</a>.</p>
<p>In the Washington Post, Brian Frosh and Jamie Raskin argue that if progressives want to undo the effects of <em>Citizens United</em>—a bad idea, to be sure—they <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/12/AR2010031203149.html">ought to turn to the states</a>, which retain broad regulatory powers.  (Full disclosure: Brian is a cousin.)</p>
<p>And last but not least, an amusing video of President George W. Bush wiping his hand on his predecessor:</p>
<p><span class="youtube">
<iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="445" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0oHOUnQ0gYI?color1=d6d6d6&amp;color2=f0f0f0&amp;border=0&amp;fs=1&amp;hl=en&amp;modestbranding=1&amp;loop=&amp;showinfo=0&amp;iv_load_policy=3&amp;showsearch=0&amp;rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</span><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oHOUnQ0gYI"><img src="http://img.youtube.com/vi/0oHOUnQ0gYI/default.jpg" width="130" height="97" border=0></a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2010/03/friday-links-paul-ryan-on-health-care-making-matthew-2611-a-reality-and-federalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I’m Reading  — December 23rd</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/12/what-im-reading-december-23rd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/12/what-im-reading-december-23rd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Checks and Balances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E.J. Dionne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Founders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher_Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackson_Toby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard_Epstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from December 21st to December 23rd.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704304504574610040924143158.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Richard Epstein: Harry Reid Turns Insurance Into a Public Utility.</a> “The argument seems to be that price controls alone can force out the waste and inefficiency that are posited to be the hallmark of private markets. By this twisted logic, rent control is the perfect path to efficient competitive markets.”</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703523504574604443236619168.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Creating Incentives for Learning.</a> “Mr. Toby’s main proposal, then, is to require good grades and test scores from those seeking federal student loans. This requirement, he believes, would improve incentives for academic performance and mitigate the inevitable trade-off between widening access to college and maintaining educational standards.”</li>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/20/AR2009122002129.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Exactly Why the Founders Divided the Legislative Branch.</a> E.J. Dionne argues against checks and balances: “In a normal democracy, such majorities would work their will, a law would pass, and champagne corks would pop. But everyone must get it through their heads that thanks to the bizarre habits of the Senate, we are no longer a normal democracy.”</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704238104574602042125998498.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Debunking Conspiracy Theories.</a> “Today no conspiracist publication or Web site wants for the outward flourishes of scholarship. The footnotes are compendious, the sources are seemingly authoritative. It is only when you get in amongst them that you discover what the footnotes actually refer to.”</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/12/what-im-reading-december-23rd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I’m Reading  — October 26th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/10/what-im-reading-october-26th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/10/what-im-reading-october-26th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political_science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social_science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from October 22nd to October 26th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/25/AR2009102502041.html?nav=hcmoduletmv" title="Link to Bookmark">Robert Samuelson on the Public Option.</a> “The promise of the public plan is a mirage. Its political brilliance is to use free-market rhetoric (more ‘choice’ and ‘competition’) to expand government power.”</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703298004574455560453947646.html?mod=djemEditorialPage" title="Link to Bookmark">Unlearning the Lessons of State Health Reforms.</a> “Despite these state-level failures, President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats are pushing forward a slate of similar reforms. Unlike most high-school science fair participants, they seem unaware that the point of doing experiments is to identify what actually works. Instead, they’ve identified what doesn’t—and decided to do it again.”</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/books/20poli.html?_r=1" title="Link to Bookmark">Just How Relevant Is Political Science?</a> </li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/10/what-im-reading-october-26th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What I’m Reading  — August 20th</title>
		<link>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/08/what-im-reading-august-20th/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/08/what-im-reading-august-20th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathaniel Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[What I’m Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delicious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan_McArdle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rationing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student_loans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nathanielward.net/?p=508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the links I've collected from around the web from August 12th to August 20th.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203550604574360541357223298.html" title="Link to Bookmark">Obama Contradicts Himself on Health Care.</a> “So the health-care status quo needs top-to-bottom reform, except for the parts that “you” happen to like. Government won’t interfere with patients and their physicians, considering that the new panel of experts who will make decisions intended to reduce tests and treatments doesn’t count as government. But Medicare shows that government involvement isn’t so bad, aside from the fact that spending is out of control—and that program needs top-to-bottom reform too.”</li>
<li><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203863204574348662300995456.html?mod=djemEditorialPage" title="Link to Bookmark">Another ‘Public Option.’</a> How government “competition” is wrecking the private student loan industry.</li>
<li><a href="http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/08/rationing_by_any_other_name.php" title="Link to Bookmark">Market Rationing Isn’t Government Rationing.</a> “Using the government’s coercive power to decide the price of something, or who ought to get it, is qualitatively different from the same outcome arising out of voluntary actions in the marketplace.”</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nathanielward.net/2009/08/what-im-reading-august-20th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.nathanielward.net @ 2012-02-11 08:11:32 -->
